Monthly net income: $155 which translate to about 9% leveraged annual return.
This is before income and federal tax. Besides, I have ignored CAPEX and eviction allowance. And My calculation barely break even for turnkey properties in Texas (high property tax and insurance premium)
My question is there are real estate related private equity funds that generate net of state income tax which yield around 8-9% per year, so I'm really in a dilemma to choose between the both options. Or should I go the traditional way and engage a realtor to find good deals?
I wouldn't overlook that with just the additional principle payment of your $155 a month profit the house is 1/2 paid off in 11 years and fully paid off in 19 years.
At the end of 19 years your property value should have at a minimum doubled as well as the rent should have doubled in value so you've got a $200,000 net worth and close to $18,000 a year in income.
Buy 5 of these properties makes you a millionaire with almost $100,000 of income.
Hard to beat the slow, inevitable march of financial success in by and hold real estate.
Things get even better and get better faster with faster principal payoffs or finding better cashflow.
In many areas a B class property may not work. Or it may only work taking into account appreciation. The problem is you can't count on appreciation in the medium term.
My feeling has always been the 1% test does not work. I don't see how a property makes money at 1%. Do those funds really generate 8-9% or is that a proforma? Have they been in business long enough to experience the need for capital expenses or to see the effect of random evens?
Ya those numbers are proforma or past performance. Most funds started after the crash, around 2009. I believe that's how they get higher hostorical returns too.
I have the same feeling as you where 1% rule hardly pencil out.
Seems like you'll need to find a bigger discount. Remember that distressed does not necessarily mean the property has to be distressed. It could mean the seller is distressed. If you get a little picky with your purchasing, it may take a little longer to purchase but you should be able to get into a B property from a motivated seller. Harder to find but possible.
You will find that for example C and D quality homes will always look like they produce better figures but once you get to A and B, there is a trade off as the numbers dont look as good but the idea is that you have a nicer home, nicer area and better tenants which should ultimately be a better investment long term.
If doing turnkey look for properties that are fully renovated, and thus won't have the 10% maintenance cost you are allowing for in your example. I would allow 5-7%, and 5% for vacancies. Then do better than 1% in a lower tax area. Make sure you have excellent property management in place. I have C & B area/quality properties, and can tell you that the B property has performed the best.
You said your "leveraged annual return" will be ~9%. This is incorrect. Your cash on cash return would be about 9% with the example you gave.
Your "Internal Rate of Return", or IRR, will likely be somewhat higher than that, depending on several assumptions, esp. regarding the sale of the property and capital expenditures, but I would bet it would pencil out to 15% or so based on the example you gave. IRR includes non-cash items such as principal pay down, tax advantages, etc.
I won't try to convince you that turn-key, class A or B properties will offer significantly greater returns than the stock market. They won't. The barriers to entry for turn-key properties are low enough that anyone that can get a mortgage can do it. If everyone is capable of participating in a certain investment, then the returns will normalize.
So why do people still buy real estate vs. the stock market?
1.) They might consider it less risky than the stock market.
2.) They might want to take advantage of the tax treatment of real estate (passive income losses, depreciation).
3.) They might want to hedge against inflation by owning something tangible.
4.) A host of other reasons, usually peculiar to real estate.
How can you do better than the stock market?
Dig, dig, and then dig some more. Learn about real estate by engaging in it. Study it. Observe what others are doing, befriend them, and learn from them. Minimize your mistakes and protect your principal.
Then apply your time, network and superior knowledge to participate in investments that are inaccessible to the general public and you will (hopefully) generate outsized returns.
I agree with what @Gautam Venkatesan said, I would focus on finding different areas were the "B Class" is not 100k.
I am not a Turnkey Rental provider, but if I was going to buy Turnkey Rentals I would look into Memphis and Indy.
I think Indy you can get in cheaper probably, but I think in Memphis you have a lot more security. Again these are just my opinions has I have not bought in either area.
In my area where I have bought my personal rental portfolio I get "B" houses all in for around 60k to 90k. But you have to remember I am buying direct and there is no mark up, so I maybe in a 3/1 for 60k with rent of 950 a month, which is great but I also found the property, oversaw the rehab, funded it all, and then rented it out.
Lastly, check out @Jay Hinrichs and @Brie Schmidt website. As that rolls out more and more you should be able to get a lot of info on their Turnkey Reviews site. I think it will help the real "Turnkey Rental Providers" and hurt the poor ones.
Can you expound on your statement "I think Indy you can get in cheaper probably, but I think in Memphis you have a lot more security." What do you mean exactly?
I can only give you my opinion, as I have not bought in either place. But have looked at RE in both places.
Indy-- I mean you can get a "B Class" rental for under 100k. You will still be in a B class neighborhood, but your entry point will be a lower. BUT I can't say that I think Indy will ever be a high growing appreciation area. Therefore your investment maybe a little more risky.
Memphis-- You will have a higher entry point but I think your overall investment is a little more secure, meaning in the long run I think Memphis will out preform Indy in appreciation. Now between those years you have to choose do you want more monthly cashflow or a long term better investment with a little less monthly cashflow.
I think that @Curt Davis would be a lot better than I in giving you insight on where and when to buy in Memphis.
Again, I am strictly giving you my opinion on two places that I think are great ROI for Turnkey Buyers. One more good thing about Memphis is that if a certain PM never worked out there are plenty of great PMs there to help protect your investment.
Your calculation is basically a cash on cash return only. That's one way to look at it, but ignoring principal pay down is short sighted in my view. Also you are assuming zero rent increase and zero appreciation in your calculation.
A more in depth analysis, you'd probably find an IRR in the mid teens pretty easily for your provided example. That said, most of us try to do better than the 1% rule.
You are clearly more experienced than me but I think TX and Memphis share similar buy-in, rent and return profiles. I think TX has much higher property taxes but also higher rates of appreciation at least historically. I think both areas also have more newer builds than other areas so the housing stock is a little more worry free than some other cash flow markets if you go with A or B class.
@Curt Davis would know best though as he knows Memphis.
@Larry Fried he did not account for capex so I would argue then number is very low if you lump in some "capex costs" amortized over time.
@Martin Yung your vacancy might be a little low as 1 month is a little over 8% though I have struggled with this number too because chances are you do not have one every year. I also think the price can be slightly less or rent slightly more from the better turn-key companies. Additionally, you included debt pay down as part of your payment. if you are going to do that I typically use an IRR measure because debt paydowns are really an investment back into the asset and not money out the door. This will probably bring the return a little over 10% which is what I have seen. For reference, I think if you look at the market performance of many larger funds over long time horizons decent ones compound at about 10% - 12% at least if you look at the last 10 years.
I too have struggled with if I should include appreciation (only amounts above cost inflation) in the return calculation and have never really resolved it. If you do obviously returns get a lot better.
I'll add that typically the stock market is much more volatile than rental properties.
The market may average 8 to 10 percent over the long haul, but it's all over the place getting there. It may be up 40% in one year, and then flat or negative for a couple. And in reality it's more extreme than that....something like the best 100 days make up almost all of the stock markets return over the last generation. If you missed those, you're out of luck.
The only way to invest in the market, in my opinion, is to do so slowly and constantly, via dollar cost averaging.
That is quite a contrast from a rental property where one can project with some reasonable certainty, what the income/return will be.
I can only give you my opinion, as I have not bought in either place. But have looked at RE in both places.
Indy-- I mean you can get a "B Class" rental for under 100k. You will still be in a B class neighborhood, but your entry point will be a lower. BUT I can't say that I think Indy will ever be a high growing appreciation area. Therefore your investment maybe a little more risky.
Memphis-- You will have a higher entry point but I think your overall investment is a little more secure, meaning in the long run I think Memphis will out preform Indy in appreciation. Now between those years you have to choose do you want more monthly cashflow or a long term better investment with a little less monthly cashflow.
I think that @Curt Davis would be a lot better than I in giving you insight on where and when to buy in Memphis.
Again, I am strictly giving you my opinion on two places that I think are great ROI for Turnkey Buyers. One more good thing about Memphis is that if a certain PM never worked out there are plenty of great PMs there to help protect your investment.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Andrew
Andrew, as an Indy investor and resident, I do agree with you. Indy has never been a rapid appreciation market, and I don't see that changing in the future....though we have had about 5.4% year over year median price increases currently, which is solid.
Historically, Indy had always been a very slow but steady market, with 2 to 3 percent growth. The recession threw that out, like everywhere else...but overall our market didn't see big drops....nor did we have big run ups prior.
Certain areas of town have seen very, very strong appreciation in recent years, while others have stagnated.
One Interesting fact...Indy is the largest city in the country that is without any natural geographic barriers...and can therefore grow out in every direction.
Thanks everyone for the great advise, @Charles Worth@Rusty Scott@Nate Garrett thanks for reminding me on using IRR, indeed I have forgotten the principal pay down, thanks. You guys have convinced me.
I'm working with a builder and we have new construction homes at $75/ sq ft. The land was cheap. They cash flow pretty good. So I guess it depends on where and how your find the deal. I personally like B class turnkey properties and those tend to cash flow as well. As long as you can get a 1% rent to value ratio, the deal will cash flow. (unless you have an expensive HOA)
I wouldn't overlook that with just the additional principle payment of your $155 a month profit the house is 1/2 paid off in 11 years and fully paid off in 19 years.
At the end of 19 years your property value should have at a minimum doubled as well as the rent should have doubled in value so you've got a $200,000 net worth and close to $18,000 a year in income.
Buy 5 of these properties makes you a millionaire with almost $100,000 of income.
Hard to beat the slow, inevitable march of financial success in by and hold real estate.
Things get even better and get better faster with faster principal payoffs or finding better cashflow.
Just thought I would add my two sense. Toledo, Ohio, has a great sustainable B class area. The properties are cheap and the tenants are not going anywhere :) Great place to invest!