Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 10 years ago,
Question regarding SFH Rental in Michigan (50% Rule)
Hello all,
Let me preface this post with- I am still new and looking for my best SFH rental entry point (so please.. go easy..) In doing research and crunching #s, I'm struggling with getting anything to cashflow with using conventional financing, especially when using the 50% rule for expense estimating.
As example, the following property is listed for $75K in my area: http://www.moveinmichigan.com/MIMPubliclogon.aspx?...
If I buy this property at $75K, put 20% down with a conventional 30 yr, and achieve $1k/mo in rent (which is what comps for this type of property)... the following #s is what I see at a high level:
- Principal & Interest: $293/mo
-Tax : $150/mo
-Insurance (est): $50/mo
Total PITI: $493
Est Expenses (50% Rule): $500
-----------------------------------------
Total Expense + PITI = $993/mo
Income ($1k rent w/ 9% Vacancy Loss): $910/mo
Cashflow in this scenario is negative.. with 1.3% rent/price ratio.
Even with a sales price of something like $55K (1.8% rent/price ratio), this doesn't cash flow.
Now with the same above scenario, using est 30% expense assumption cashflows $180/mo.
Am I being too conservative on expenses for a ~1,200 sq ft. brick bungalow ? I'm not seeing how traditional financing, while using the 50% rule for est expenses, is going to cashflow at all with properties under $150K.
I realize the 50% rule is just a gross figure to use to quickly evaluate a deal, but if I were to use this on anything it would seem to always showstop any property.