Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

52
Posts
10
Votes
Erik R.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Northville, MI
10
Votes |
52
Posts

Question regarding SFH Rental in Michigan (50% Rule)

Erik R.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Northville, MI
Posted

Hello all,

Let me preface this post with- I am still new and looking for my best SFH rental entry point (so please.. go easy..) In doing research and crunching #s, I'm struggling with getting anything to cashflow with using conventional financing, especially when using the 50% rule for expense estimating.

As example, the following property is listed for $75K in my area: http://www.moveinmichigan.com/MIMPubliclogon.aspx?...

If I buy this property at $75K, put 20% down with a conventional 30 yr, and achieve $1k/mo in rent (which is what comps for this type of property)... the following #s is what I see at a high level:

- Principal & Interest: $293/mo

-Tax : $150/mo

-Insurance (est): $50/mo

Total PITI: $493

Est Expenses (50% Rule): $500

-----------------------------------------

Total Expense + PITI = $993/mo

Income ($1k rent w/ 9% Vacancy Loss): $910/mo

Cashflow in this scenario is negative.. with 1.3%  rent/price ratio.

Even with a sales price of something like $55K (1.8% rent/price ratio), this doesn't cash flow.

Now with the same above scenario, using est 30% expense assumption cashflows $180/mo.

Am I being too conservative on expenses for a ~1,200 sq ft. brick bungalow ? I'm not seeing how traditional financing, while using the 50% rule for est expenses, is going to cashflow at all with properties under $150K. 

I realize the 50% rule is just a gross figure to use to quickly evaluate a deal, but if I were to use this on anything it would seem to always showstop any property.

Loading replies...