Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 17 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

92
Posts
3
Votes
Andrew B.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Calgary
3
Votes |
92
Posts

Thought it was a loser but..

Andrew B.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Calgary
Posted

Taxes are $1173.13, tenants pay $710.00/month = $17040.00/yr, Insurance is $697.68, tenants are on a lease with a 60 day notice required, Tenants pay all utilities including hot water tank rental. Which is $34.61 quarterly.

This a 2 unit building (each 3 bedrooms), Selling for 144,000 but I could get it for 134,000.

Just because the tenants pay utilites how does that change things?, because it obviously doesnt work with the 2 percent rule or 50 percent gross rents. But I see a 345 dollars cashflow before repairs a month?

What am I not seeing or is it an ok deal? I know you wont like it Mike but I cant find a duplex for under 100K like you can :P lol!

Thanks Guys

Loading replies...