Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago,

User Stats

156
Posts
50
Votes
Cody Steck
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • Salt Lake City, UT
50
Votes |
156
Posts

Non owner-occupied FHA takeover?

Cody Steck
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • Salt Lake City, UT
Posted

I came across a duplex that has good numbers and looks like a deal. Seller is asking 175k and has about 152k left on the mortgage. They said they would be willing to carry back the difference if you took over the loan. I then found out that the loan is an FHA which nullifies the chances of assuming the loan because you have to owner occupy (as far as I understand).

The seller said they spoke to another investor which already has 10 properties and wanted to do a 'subject to' deal and pay the mortgage through a third party? Is there a way to do this? I guess it is possible this owner could occupy it but I highly doubt it.

Any creative ways out there to get around this that I am not thinking about? 

Loading replies...