Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 17 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/926b4/926b4a4391c28798f6a6e32c7173850fb6bc658c" alt="Brian Stein's profile image"
A property good for rehab but not for rent?
So I basically have seen two basic formulas on these message boards to determine whether or not a property is a good buy.
For rehabbing: (ARV * 70%) - repairs = Max Purchase Price
For Renting: Rent * 50 = Max Purchase Price
I would like to buy a property to Rehab, but be able to fall back and rent it if I can't find a buyer quickly... while also having positive cash flow after mortgage and operating expenses.
If I put an offer on a property for $25k and the ARV is $50k (if I put in all new flooring, paint, and redo the kitchen and both bathrooms) that leaves me $10k (According to the formula) for repairs which I could likely do if I'm doing it all myself.
BUT...
That would have me with $35k into the property, and I am only confident of being able to rent for $600... Which would make this a loser according to the rent * 50 = Max purchase price. I would have $35k in a house according to the formula I should only pay $30k for.
Does this make this a bad deal?