Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc761/cc761e586fd75945edf52227f74423af0bcd379f" alt="Rick Fowler's profile image"
What should I do with this Chicago 2-flat (duplex)?
I bought this Chicago duplex to live in just before the market topped in 2006. Then I lived in it while the market tanked, and I rented both units when I moved to Colorado because I couldn't afford to sell it. Now it's fully rented - never had a vacancy. But since I bought it too high, it's negative cash flow. By the time I file my tax return, it's close to breakeven for the year, but it's negative real cash flow about $500 monthly. This is a terrific neighborhood for rentals, and duplex conversions to SFR are common in this area. (North Center/Lincoln Square if you know Chicago. Major cross streets, Western and Montrose) The market is coming back - it's about 10% down from when I bought it. Finishes are rental level, and I have raised rents on turnover. Equity is about 10%. This market will probably appreciate - it's established and solid - came back much before many other Chicago neighborhoods. But it's not going to be a screamer probably ever.
Bigger picture, my major goal is to build passive cash flow for the long term. This albatross raises my DTI, so adding new rentals to my portfolio is tough (as far as I know).
Two loans on it
380k at 5.125%
80k at 4.75%
I refi'd it in 2010 when banks were rushing to do refi's before the government made them do something drastic.
I would have to bring about 60k to get the loan balance down enough that a 4% loan would bring cash flow to breakeven. That includes discounting the soft expenses (vacancy = 0, which is true, reserve is 0, maintenance is 50/month, management is 120/month).
One more kicker. Since I have taken depreciation every year, I will have a sizable tax bill when I sell it even if there are no sales proceeds.
I'm looking for some ideas about what to do with this property. Address is 2471 W. Pensacola Ave., Chicago, IL, 60618.
Sell it?
Exchange?
Hold it and raise rents?
Lease option?
Something else?
I'm looking for any ideas. Thanks!
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ea43/4ea439a346554060cc0b0554d531c4cd9155e1fc" alt="Jay Helms's profile image"
I'm in a similar situation with one of my properties Rick. Bought SFR in 2006 with 0% down, now have a little equity in it, never refinanced, but been renting for negative 300$ monthly cash flow for the last 4.5 years. I currently have my property on the market to sell. It has taken me a while, but now that I've "seen the light" - negative cash flow is disgusting. At one point I tried to justify holding on to it, IF (which it's wasn't), but if the property was appreciating at $300/month, it might be worth holding onto. It's not. Tax breaks didn't help me either. Tax breaks allowed me to convince myself I was "breaking even", but I was only fooling myself. I'm not in it to break even.
Another rule I picked up on the BP podcast (don't remember which one), that finally pushed me to put it on the market, is it is time to sell if the property rents at 0.5% of the current value. I was at 0.54% and the area want take a substantial rent increase to get to the 1-2% range. Time to move on.
Best of luck. Looking forward to your update.