Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
2
Votes
Syed Kamal
  • Investor
  • Houston, TX
2
Votes |
11
Posts

Financial Analysis

Syed Kamal
  • Investor
  • Houston, TX
Posted

The napkin based financial analysis presented at this site is great. I am trying to understand and use it. I have just one question:

In calculation of net income why do you exclude principle and interest payments. Shouldn't at least the interest paid on mortgage be included in the expenses of the property. Otherwise doesn't estimated net income become overstated. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

350
Posts
138
Votes
Brett Russell
  • Investor
  • Chelsea, MI
138
Votes |
350
Posts
Brett Russell
  • Investor
  • Chelsea, MI
Replied

@Syed Kamal , welcome to the site!

It's not that principle and interest payments are "excluded" just that they are considered later in the process.  Net operating income is supposed to be a function of the property itself independent of debt service costs since each investor will have different financing needs and requirements.

For example, if one investor can get a 30 year, conventional mortgage with a  very low interest rate, but another investor needs a commercial loan with a higher interest rate and only 25 year amortization, their debt service costs on the same property could be quite different.  The final cash flow numbers will work out differently in those 2 scenarios, but the deal didn't change.

But, to address your concern, yes you do need to make sure the net operating income does cover the debt service costs and leaves acceptable cashflow.

Loading replies...