Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

170
Posts
63
Votes
Carolyn L.
  • Home Stager
  • Sussex, WI
63
Votes |
170
Posts

Teachable moment? Austin investors: Two properties; one owner; and the BSC: Can these properties be saved?

Carolyn L.
  • Home Stager
  • Sussex, WI
Posted

How would you solve this problem?  Let me know your thoughts!

I’ve had my eye on two boarded up, deteriorating residential properties built in 1919 and 1922, next door to each other, each on approx. ¼ acre lots, nice Central Austin neighborhood, but these two have several structural and utility problems and are the blight of the neighborhood. Given the information that follows, would you pursue these properties? And if so, what would your course of action be? Demolition and rebuild? Single family, condos or multifamily? How would the fines be negotiated with the BSC?

If not worth pursuing, what is the likely outcome? The owner isn't likely to pay the fines; the city has not yet moved to demolish the properties.

My research found that these properties are owned by one individual, purchased together from the same previous owner in April, 1998. One is a single family with detached garage / outbuilding possible garage apartment; the other is listed as a triplex with detached garage/outbuilding. A common alley separates the lots through the block to the next street.

The current owner address is in the same neighborhood, is a self-employed professional, who has had past state and federal tax lien issues in the triple digits. The properties have had several code violations ultimately leading to emergency board and securing the structures as far back as 2004, including removal of tenants, and both properties have legal binding orders from the Building and Standards Commission in effect on March, 2005 and October, 2008.The owner is being assessed a fine of $500 per week on each property until resolution. If the properties are sold, the fines and liens of course transfer. The property taxes have been paid on time and are current.

Here’s a breakdown of values from property tax statements and accumulated unpaid fines assessed by the Building & Standards Commission:

Past sales within neighboring and subject properties zip code: November, 2013 – September 11, 2014:

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

32
Posts
12
Votes
Brian Whitten
  • Involved In Real Estate
  • Austin, TX
12
Votes |
32
Posts
Brian Whitten
  • Involved In Real Estate
  • Austin, TX
Replied

@Carolyn L. 

I do not have experience in exactly what you are doing, but in the past year I have had much of the same issues.  Tally Two was debating on whether or not to purchase a distressed property out in Bastrop.  Schedule C on the title search was about as long as a toilet paper roll and included all sorts of liens including a dreadful IRS lien.  

There was no time to try and negotiate liens or even pay them off for that matter (Foreclosure pending), so we did the unthinkable.... we bought the property subject to all the liens, yuck!  However, this did give us time to go out an try to negotiate the liens with the lienholders.  We were able to get some of them removed completely.  The IRS lien would not budge, and in fact was incredibly difficult to even pay.  The IRS just couldn't wrap it through their heads that we owned the property with the lien attached.  They just kept saying that the sale was illegal and they initially WOULDN'T EVEN TAKE OUR MONEY to pay the lien.  

On top of the lien drama, we had a squatter move into one of our houses and played the system.  That is another drama story that I don't have time to post, but if you want to read about squatters and how hard it is to get them evicted out of your house, we posted a page about it on our website to help out other investors going through the same situation.  http://www.tallytwoinvestmentgroup.com/eviction/

The final straw that made this deal nerve racking was the fact that in order to profit on it, we had to be able to divide up the 5 acres into 3 separate parcels.  No other investor would take this on...  

To sum up my point, the only reason this deal made sense was because we had to do several things out-of-the-box that a new investor (or even experienced investor) would not feel comfortable taking on because of the risks. We ended up tackling this project and it has become VERY PROFITABLE from a money standpoint, but also VERY TIME CONSUMING. However, the lessons we learned have been invaluable for any future projects that aren't your typical (70% ARV - repairs) that investors drool for.

Loading replies...