Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 5 months ago on .

User Stats

24
Posts
0
Votes
Sheldon Alex
0
Votes |
24
Posts

Very Interesting Short-Term Flip With $400,000 Added Value

Sheldon Alex
Posted

Hey everyone. This is a rather interesting scenario I evaluated a few months ago. The borrower purchased the subject property at a VERY HIGH PRICE. Why? Because I came up with an ARV of only $550,000, based on comps that sold 3 months prior located in the same subdivision as the subject property.

However, notice there's $400,000 in FORCED APPRECIATION the borrower added to the property value. It's because he had a willing and able buyer who planned to purchase the property at a steep price of $950,000.

In my eyes, this project is as risky as it gets, even though the borrower was also a real estate agent that was waiving the listing side of the commission. Banking on one buyer to purchase a property at $400,000 above the estimated ARV can easily go sideways. Thus, I instantly concluded this lending opportunity being a NO GO. What are your thoughts?