Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 9 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
3
Votes
Austin James
3
Votes |
9
Posts

63 unit multifamily renovation: can’t decide between these TWO strategies

Austin James
Posted

I have 63 units under contract for 4.2M. The property is extremely mismanaged and the tenants are quite undesirable.

20 of the units are affordable housing tenants and 5 of them are on a master lease with this company who lets the homeless community use the units. (The shopping carts outside are a sight to behold.) 

The dilemma i have is that I can’t decide if it makes more sense to embrace the c class identity this property gives the impression of, or put a lot more into the renovation, get better quality tenants and convert it to the B class property that the building (and the area) should/could be. 

90% occupied, the yearly rental income is around 600k with 420k NOI.

Thanks in advance for any feedback 

Loading replies...