Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 12 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

84
Posts
3
Votes
Chris Terborg
3
Votes |
84
Posts

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

98
Posts
53
Votes
Thomas Santella
  • Real Estate Agent
  • NJ & NY
53
Votes |
98
Posts
Thomas Santella
  • Real Estate Agent
  • NJ & NY
Replied

Your plan is to wholesale the deal and make a 200k profit, by just offering 200k less than asking price. I don't think that is a good strategy, nor will it work in most situations. Unless the seller is dying to sell, or you can sense his/her willingness to depart from the property then I wouldn't say this is a go. More so, the flipper is not going to want an 8% return. No one taking on an 800k project and a 1.3m purchase price will only seek 8% back. Simply put, you want 200k for lowballing the seller and finding a buyer but you think a flipper spending 2.1M total and taking on over a 6 month project only wants double? I don't think so 

Loading replies...