Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Eran Roseman
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Iowa City, IA
0
Votes |
5
Posts

A multifamily rental deal analysis

Eran Roseman
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Iowa City, IA
Posted

Hey All!

I am new to this community. It looks like a great community and I am proud to be a member.

I would like to hear your opinion on a deal I am checking out.

It is a 3 units house. There are two 2 bedrooms units and one 3 bedroom unit.

There are long term tenants in the house. They are on month-to-month basis.

The house was built in 1890. It is in more then reasonable condition, taking it's age into consideration. Interior is is decent condition low quality finish. New windows, vinyl siding and roof were installed in 2002. New gas lines and furnace in 2008. New water heating in 2008.

It is located in a low income neighborhood, but not "ghetto".

The owner request 75,000$.

No repair currently required.

Current rent for all 3 units is 1,500$, which is exactly 2%.

Expenses:

Gas: 175$

Water: 150$

Electricity: 0$ (paid by tenants)

Tax: 215$

Insurance: 100$ (estimate)

Property management: 125$ (estimate)

TOTAL: 765$

The total is 50% of the rent, but does not includes vacancy and big repairs.

Adding 10% vacancy and 10% big repairs budget, the TOTAL is 1,065$

Mortgage with no money down: 380$ (estimate)

Net Cashflow: 55$

Up to here, nothing too exiting.

The current property management says that it is important for the owner to keep the rent low. He believe in being fair and affordable. He also likes to keep the vacancy rate down. This strategy works and the vacancy rate is practically zero.

According to rentometer the 20th percentile for 2 bedroom apartment in this area is 550$ and 700$ for 3 bedroom. The units in this house are rather small and basic, so 20th percentile seems fair.

Assuming that I can raise the rent by 20% and that I negotiate a better deal and close at 70,000$, the number looks like this:

Cost: 70,000$

Rent: 1,800$ (2.6% of cost)

Total expenses: 1,148$ (64% of rent)

Mortgage: 354$

Net Cashflow: 299$

Now this numbers look much better.

My questions are:

  1. Did I missed anything?
  2. Is it safe to make such an assumption about the rent?
  3. I thought that the 50% rule supposed to be conservative. The expenses here are significantly higher. What can I deduct from that?
  4. Would you go for such a deal?

I will be more the happy to get any feedback.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

55
Posts
42
Votes
Kevin Nalley
  • Investor
  • Louisville, KY
42
Votes |
55
Posts
Kevin Nalley
  • Investor
  • Louisville, KY
Replied

I'm with Aaron, I have passed on properties that require me to pay anything but water, and I don't even like paying that. Even with water, I've seen some wild fluctuations in bi-monthly bills.

Considering you're from Iowa and there are 3 units in this building, $175 for gas seems very low, especially in winter.

I have 22 doors right now (two duplexes, two 4-plexes, one tri-plex, and the rest are houses) and all of them are built in the late 1800's and early 1900's. 10% for maintenance is not enough, I would factor in a minimum of 20%, it seems like there's always something to fix with these old buildings and nothing in them is square or standard. With a mere 22 doors, I have a full time maintenance guy that stays very busy.

The biggest problem with slightly above Ghetto properties is tenant screening... I can't stress enough to learn everything you can about screening and do it thoroughly.

Loading replies...