Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 11 years ago,

User Stats

11
Posts
2
Votes
Will Samsky
  • Scottsdale, AZ
2
Votes |
11
Posts

Analyze a buy and hold deal

Will Samsky
  • Scottsdale, AZ
Posted

I have been practicing analyzing some buy and hold deals in my area and came across this one that seems like a pretty good deal on a duplex. I just wanted to get some opinions on my numbers and anything I'm missing. Right now it is occupied without leases and I wouldn't be able to walk through until in contract to determine needed repairs but it most likely looks like some landscaping. I have no clue about expenses as this would be my first deal so I'm using 50% rule only as no financials are available. Asking price is 70,000 probably would offer 58ish and hopefully end up around 62k. Just looking to get info on my numbers and anything I may be overlooking.

Loading replies...