Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago,

User Stats

102
Posts
67
Votes
Nick Coons
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Tempe, AZ
67
Votes |
102
Posts

Evaluating Alternate Strategies Mid-Deal

Nick Coons
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Tempe, AZ
Posted

I purchased a property about three months ago as a flx-and-flip, and I have about three months remaining on the project. It's a full gut and rehab. My long-term goal is to buy and hold rentals. However, I know the infinite BRRRR is uncommon (especially in markets like Phoenix, where my property is), so I know I'll probably have to leave cash in each deal. That's the reason for the fix-and-flip(s), buying those in between rentals to raise additional cash so that I can leave cash in a rental without running out (preventing me from continuing on to the next, or depleting my cushion).

My plan with this property was to net about $40k after absolutely everything. With the softening of the market, I'm anticipating a lower ARV was when I originally analyzed this property, and now I'm thinking it's realistic that I'll net $10k-$15k. That's much lower than what I'm really wanting from this deal, so now I'm considering alternate strategies. Namely, keeping it as a rental for a couple of years for the market go rebound, then selling for what I wanted (or, just keeping it as if I had intended to hold it as a rental).

In doing so, I'm looking at the pros of each. If I keep with my original plan and sell it once completed:

- I get all of my original cash back out, plus about $10k in profit. In this scenario, I have the most cash available for the next deal.

If I hold onto it:

- Best case, I can cash-out refinance it at 75% LTV and get back a little less than half my cash. That would still allow me to move forward with another deal, but with far more restrictions on what I can do because I have less cash.

- When I do sell it, the profits are LTCG instead of ordinary income.

- There are some exterior repairs that need to be done on the property before selling, but if I'm keeping it as a rental, some of these could be deferred (these items could be worked on and completed while I have a tenant in the property). However, not completing these things might affect my refinance appraisal.

- If I were in the market to buy a rental property on purpose, this would be a property that I'd want. It's a growing area, and rents are strong (and likely to remain that way).

- Since this is a full gut and rebuild, I shouldn't have much in the way of cap-ex, once completed, for quite some time.

So my questions are as follows:

- Are there pros (or cons) in the above strategies that I'm not considering that might help me make my decision? If I could somehow find a magical 85%+ LTV cash-out refinance on a rental property, that would pretty much solidify the decision for me, but I don't see that being realistic (also, with the associated monthly payment, it could cash-flow negative.. fine by me, but that would make it difficult to qualify).

- Are there other strategies that I should consider? This property would not make for a good STR, so I'm intentionally not considering that.

  • Nick Coons
  • Loading replies...