Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
BRRRR - Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

54
Posts
15
Votes
Scott K.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Bushwick, Brooklyn
15
Votes |
54
Posts

Do SFR = more equity where MFR = more cash flow?

Scott K.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Bushwick, Brooklyn
Posted

In the BRRRR podcast, episode 327, David Greene made a comment (1:08:30ish) suggesting his single-family homes tend to add equity for him and his multi-family homes contribute more cashflow. He suggested the two asset classes work with one another in a complementary fashion.

Can someone explain why this is true (particularly why single-family properties tend to add more equity). I'd be especially curious to see any example math behind this if it exists somewhere.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBci62dfqaY

Loading replies...