BRRRR - Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 1 year ago,
Buy and Hold Remodel: Would you replace a 80% furnace from 1999?
I'm remodeling a couple of older houses in the same neighborhood with the intention of cash-out refinancing them in the upcoming weeks. They're both the exact same type and layout of house, however one had the existing furnace removed prior to purchase, and the other has an existing furnace that was installed in 1999. Neither homes have central AC, which I intend to install. I've gotten a few quotes from HVAC contractors that are happy to give me a discount for having everything done all at once. Tenants will pay their own utilities.
My objective is to repair and update whatever is necessary now so that I (ideally and hopefully) only need to concern myself with cosmetic fixes and insurable high-dollar freak accidents as much as possible over the next 20-40 years while holding these properties.
With that said, do you think it makes sense to go ahead and replace the 1999 furnace now prior to refinancing so that (1) I can capitalize on the contractor's discount, (2) I don't run into having a costly replacement sooner than later with tenants in place, and/or (3) it might help up my refinance numbers? If I do replace, I'm thinking of sticking in another 80%.
On the other hand, (1) the furnace works, (2) not replacing it means I'm saving a couple thousand right off the bat, and (3) I've heard that old vs new furnace doesn't really affect appraisal prices all that much, if at all, so perhaps I should just leave well enough alone?
TIA