Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
BRRRR - Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Los Angeles, CA
14
Votes |
70
Posts

Rental revenue and house valuation for sale/refinance

Account Closed
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted
Say you take your typical 3 br medium sized house that would typically rent for about $1500 and because of room conversion (like converting the living room/dining room/rec room/laundry room/den/etc) you now have a 6 br house and you're now getting double that and have months of proof of that.  Or years. 

Would an investor pay much more for this knowing you've just cleverly managed the space and the house itself really isn't much different from when you bought it?  

What about a bank?

Would anyone value it more for the revenue?  Isn't that what people buy businesses for in the first place? For instance in my area that typical 3 br house would sell for about $250,000.  And it would rent for about $1500.  And rooms here rent for about $500.  6 x $500 = $3000 or $36,000/annually.  At a 10% cap rate (omitting expenses which would be mostly shared) that $250,000 house is now $360,000.  Isn't a 10% cap rate particularly generous?  Wouldn't most investors jump at that?  I hear banks just look a appraised value which seems particularly short sighted.  Maybe other lenders loan on revenue more?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,166
Posts
888
Votes
Chris Davidson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Boise, ID
888
Votes |
1,166
Posts
Chris Davidson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Boise, ID
Replied
Quote from @Account Closed:

So another way may be to use that huge rental revenue as personal income to qualify for a higher mortgage.  I wonder if many people do that and if its anywhere near as good as simply getting the house valued higher?  And if the house is valued higher by the bank does that info get to the city which might raise annual taxes?  I posted about the federal tax department possibly informing the city of rental revenues from their houses, wondering if that ever happens.  What do you think?  You'd think they would share info but I haven't heard of this before.  


 Government agency's aren't know for good communication, so if the IRS was communicating with the local muni on revenue a property was getting that would be a first. Also banks aren't going to go the muni and say we think this house is worth more you need to charge more in taxes. For the most part people stay in their lane.

There are a few ways a bank looks at value, mainly through an appraiser who tells them what it is worth by either doing cost, revenue, or market. For revenue they run numbers as Long term rentals as they have to provide evidence for how they got to that number. Market they will look at similar houses that have sold recently. If you have a few years of tax returns showing where you made 36k on your property they would count that as income to boost your DTI.

Loading replies...