Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Technology
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago,

User Stats

390
Posts
125
Votes
Adrian Tilley
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • Broomfield, CO
125
Votes |
390
Posts

New Court Decision - "direct drop" voicemails violate the TCPA

Adrian Tilley
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • Broomfield, CO
Posted

I'm an attorney for my day job, and came across a Federal Court order today which holds that "direct drop" voicemails, which I know are used by many real estate investors, violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).  This is in the context of a lawsuit by a target of such voicemails suing the person who was sending the voicemails for violating the Act. 

I haven't reviewed the underlying case, so I don't know what penalties are being sought, but generally federal protection acts like this provide pretty stiff penalties for violations.  For anyone who wants an insomnia cure, the case is 17-cv-335, Saunders v. O'Neal, from the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division.  Stay legal!

Loading replies...