Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Guru, Book, & Course Reviews
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 5 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Fawn Bertram
0
Votes |
1
Posts

More Book questions: Real Estate by the Numbers - Dave Meyer, J Scott

Fawn Bertram
Posted

Chapter 11, "Hone Your Skills" section has this practice question: "What is the IRR of an investment that costs $75,000 up front, earns you $22,000 per year for four years, and then generates $115,000 at sale?" I put this into Google Sheets, and got 31.85%, whereas the book answer is 11.02%. Anyone have an idea of whether this is a mistake in the book or my/Google's calculations? The XIRR() fn works fine in the existing examples from the accompanying spreadsheet. @Dave Meyer FYI

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

118
Posts
61
Votes
David C.
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
61
Votes |
118
Posts
David C.
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

Change $22,000 to $2,200 and you get 11.01%.  They likely misstated the question.

Loading replies...