Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Spokane Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Andrew Vargas
  • Seattle, WA
0
Votes |
4
Posts

Questions about the market

Andrew Vargas
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

Recently I have been looking at rental property in the Spokane area and I am shocked to see some of the prices. The homes I am looking at are extremely cheap compared to those in my area. For example, I am looking at a triplex for 99,000 that doesn't seem distressed by any means. This is not a rarity, either, it seems like. Properties like this are plentiful on multiple listing sites. I'm not from the area so is there something I am missing here? Are these prices based solely on location?  

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,663
Posts
3,093
Votes
David Faulkner
  • Investor
  • Orange County, CA
3,093
Votes |
2,663
Posts
David Faulkner
  • Investor
  • Orange County, CA
Replied

I can't speak for Spokane as I'm unfamiliar with the market. However, I would warn that just because something is relatively cheap does NOT necessarily mean that it will be a better investment than the more expensive property. I think you are right to question why. I don't know the answer in this case but would advise to look at the class, stability, of the tenant base and correspondingly the work involved in being a landlord there and consistency (not just quantity) of income and expenses compared to the more expensive neighborhoods. I'd also look at how Spokane rentals and prices held up in the great recession vs. the more expensive neighborhood.

By way of analogy, I saw a similar phenominon in my market ... in LA proper, houses were going for $750k and 2 hours up the road in Antelope Valley similar houses were going for $350k. When the great recession hit, those $750k houses got knocked down to $550k and the renters held steady and solid. In the Antelope Valley, those $300k houses got knocked down to $100k, the renters stopped paying rent, and vacancies went through the roof. That was fine by me, as I held my $550k property and snatched up a few $100k properties in the fire sale from the bank. Now that the market has recovered, I'm seriously considering 1031 exchanging those Antelope Valley properties to more expensive and stable markets closer to me so I don't need to ride the roller coaster back down, though I'll be fine either way. People always automatically assume that the higher cash flow markets have less volatility or that cash flow alone is some magic bullet that will save an investor in a downturn, but in this example it was definitely not the case. Nothing wrong with investing in lower end markets like the AV, it has worked out great for me, I just prefer to buy them when they are on a fire sale. I'm not saying Spokane is like this, just a real life example to give you stuff to look out for, investigate further, and think about ...

Loading replies...