Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Seattle Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

307
Posts
191
Votes
Aaron Nelson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Maple Valley, WA
191
Votes |
307
Posts

MHA Rezone Passes in Seattle

Aaron Nelson
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Maple Valley, WA
Posted

Game changing rezone in Seattle, WA, recently passed! What do you think BP? How does this impact your investment strategy? 

 http://www.seattle.gov/hala/about/mandatory-housing-affordability-(mha)

  • Aaron Nelson

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

273
Posts
220
Votes
Brian Hughes
  • Seattle, WA
220
Votes |
273
Posts
Brian Hughes
  • Seattle, WA
Replied

IIRC The fee is between $5 and $30-something per sf for development, OR including someplace between 5% and 11% of units as permanently rent controlled/affordable. Fee must be paid whether your are building an ADU or a 100 unit tower. For those choosing to incorporate the affordable units, It also means paying the city annual fees to monitor your rent controlled units for complaince, and a bunch of other rules designed to force you to spend/maintain equally on rent controlled and market units (If you put marble countertops in the market units they want them in the rent controlled units too). The exchange is taller building heights in upzoned areas, to theoretically allow a similar overall number of market units.

Supposedly most developers are for this, as i was touted as a 'grand bargain' between the city, developers, and low income housing advocates. Missing from that are middle income people and smaller investors. For example, anybody building townhouses to replace older properties in L2 zoned city lots are never going to choose to include a below market unit (typical project replace an older SFH/Duplex with 4 or 5 townhouses) since they would be far overperforming the ratio and losing money in the process.

Since I own a now-upzoned-urban-village property the question for me is whether the upzone changes the hold/sell equation.  Short term probably not as its a good property,  long term it may change the ultimate fate of the building.

All the local neighborhood forums like nextdoor people are discussing this vigorously right now...

Loading replies...