Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Seattle Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago,

User Stats

27
Posts
25
Votes
Peter Nelson
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Seattle, WA
25
Votes |
27
Posts

How to dance around Sec. 8 requirements in Seattle & WA

Peter Nelson
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

Seattle currently includes 'source of income' as a protected class when considering tenant applicants.  On Sept. 30 a new WA state law will expand that to the entire state.  

At our property management company we are now writing all of our leases as 10-month leases, with 12-month renewals for those who want to stay and qualify.  Sec. 8 currently will not sign a 12-month lease.

I accepted Sec. 8 for 25 years.  I figured a good tenant screening process should be blind to source of income.  While I got my teeth kicked in a few times in the early going, that decision forced me to be very keen on how to accurately screen for good and bad tenants.  It took about 8 years, but I got it figured out.

4 years ago program requirements at Sec. 8 forced us out of the program.  We simply got tired of arranging for inspections, then replacing perfectly good handrails because they weren't the proper height, and so on, and so on.  When this market slows down we may reconsider.  But for now it is a lot less hassle not dealing with it.

Loading replies...