Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Austin Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago, 01/10/2020

User Stats

324
Posts
676
Votes
David Ivy
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Austin, TX
676
Votes |
324
Posts

Texas Court Strikes Down Austin Short-Term Rental Rules

David Ivy
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Austin, TX
Posted

A Texas state appeals court recently declared as unconstitutional some very substantial elements of Austin's short-term rental ordinance. In particular, the court took issue with Austin's handling of so-called "Type-2" rentals, which encompases non-owner occupied residential properties (e.g., single-family investment properties) leased for fewer than 30 days at a time. They city is no longer issuing STR permits for Type 2 properties and had planned to ban them outright in 2022. However, the court ruled that Austin's law "significantly affects property owners' substantial interests in well-recognized property rights while...serving a minimal, if any, public interest." The court also noted that many of the city's concerns about STRs--noise, disorderly conduct, public urination, improper parking, public intoxication, etc.--are already prohibited under separate law.

The ruling was handed down on Nov. 27th, and we've yet to see how exactly the city will change the current STR ordinance or whether the city will appeal the decision. The council will likely try to keep as much of the current ordinance as possible related to STR permitting and marketing. My understanding is that the city can still regulate Type 2 STRs (and all other types), but the court has ruled that the city cannot ban Type 2 rentals or otherwise refuse to permit them so long as other appropriate conditions are met. You can read the court's full opinion here and see more details here.

  • David Ivy
  • Loading replies...