Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
San Antonio Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
4
Votes
Norense Iyahen
4
Votes |
11
Posts

MF vs SF Strategy In San Antonio

Norense Iyahen
Posted

Hi folks I'm trying to better understand MF investing and possibly develop a strategy that makes sense if it's the right path for me.

So there seems to be a sentiment in the real estate investing space that it's best to get into multi family at some point. The reasons appear to make sense in theory - less risk from vacancy in particular, less expenses (but I'd be happy if someone can shed some light on this). However, I've been looking on the MLS-linked sites at multi families in San Antonio and running my numbers, and I'm wondering if this sentiment that MFs are better than SFs in San Antonio holds.

For instance, the quads I'm seeing have downpayment of over 120,000 and up (assuming 20 % down), and cash flowing $800 per month. Honestly,this doesn't look very attractive from a cash flow perspective giving the large downpayment. Where I struggle is that with the same $120,000, I can get over $1,000 in cash flow from going the SF route in similar parts of the city.  Given this, I'm wondering if MFs are a better deal than SFs in SA. My understanding is that you can also force appreciation more in SFs than MFs. So if there is greater potential  appreciation and more cash flow in SFs than MFs, is there really a strong argument for MFs over SFs in SA? Or is the main  argument for MFs over SFs that an investor can gain experience with say a quad and then move on to a >4 unit apartment complex - so potential grow really big eventually?

I realise I'm simplifying in the above with my numbers - but these are  meant just as examples. Plus, I'm taking the perspective of an investor who isnt so concerned with reaching the limit of 10 rentals from conventional lending.

For the MF investors in SA, is there more that I should think about as I look into MF investing and developing a strategy in SA?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

12
Posts
4
Votes
Replied

Honestly, both have their strengths and place in a RE portfolio. I believe that the best bet with both strategies is value add real estate. If you can acquire a SF or MF with virtually no money parked in the property, you can cash flow an attractive rate while keeping the necessary capital to keep growing. Sometimes Duplex-Quadplexes can be overrated and it is not until 16 units+ that Multi-family truly separates itself. SF also has AirBnb potential which can be insane cash flow in the right pockets of town. Long story short, they both have benefits, and it really is up to what is more attractive to you in your stage of investing. Hope that helped!

Loading replies...