Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
St. Louis Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago, 03/23/2021

User Stats

16
Posts
2
Votes
Kamil Pieniadz
  • Rental Property Investor
  • St. Louis, MO
2
Votes |
16
Posts

Realistic life expectancy of a house

Kamil Pieniadz
  • Rental Property Investor
  • St. Louis, MO
Posted

I'm currently looking at single family that was built in the 1880s. The game plan is to get into it with a VA loan so I can put no money down and avoid PMI at the same time. I want to live there for a year and then rent it out once I move. My only concern is the age of the home and what kind of life expectancy can I realistically expect from something this old. From the numbers I've ran it would be a cash flow cow but since I typically get insurance that covers the value of the home and not cost to rebuild a new one. Ideally I would like my asset not to implode on itself a couple years after purchase.

User Stats

29
Posts
14
Votes
Timothy Smith
  • Upper valley, NH
14
Votes |
29
Posts
Timothy Smith
  • Upper valley, NH
Replied

Hey Kamil,

Old homes do have their own particular challenges, there are a few specialty companies out there that deal mainly in remodeling and restoration of "classic" homes. You might want to reach out to some of them and they can fill you in on some of the particulars with old homes, but I have seen homes from the early 1800's, maybe a couple of facelifts and a structural engineer or two but, they're still standing so best case your home could have at least 80 years before it comes crashing down. 

User Stats

2,367
Posts
2,244
Votes
Jonathan R McLaughlin
Pro Member
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Boston, Massachusetts (MA)
2,244
Votes |
2,367
Posts
Jonathan R McLaughlin
Pro Member
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Boston, Massachusetts (MA)
Replied

@Kamil Pieniadz the home structure itself can last for something resembling forever. People are still living in things built in the 1700s over in Europe. Question really is the age of the systems-roof-windows-foundation-electric-heating-insulation and how many times they have been renewed/revamped etc. A house built in the 1990s might need a big overhaul as its components are on their last life, one from the 1800s might be on its 5th generation of renewal. Knob and tube, vermiculite, lead...all generational stuff that might have been switched out or still be there. I wouldn't be scared of it just because of age. Higher maintenance? almost certainly. General soundness? Can be fine.

  • Jonathan R McLaughlin
  • BiggerPockets logo
    BiggerPockets
    |
    Sponsored
    Find an investor-friendly agent in your market TODAY Get matched with our network of trusted, local, investor friendly agents in under 2 minutes

    User Stats

    9,642
    Posts
    15,472
    Votes
    JD Martin
    Property Manager
    Pro Member
    • Rock Star Extraordinaire
    • Northeast, TN
    15,472
    Votes |
    9,642
    Posts
    JD Martin
    Property Manager
    Pro Member
    • Rock Star Extraordinaire
    • Northeast, TN
    ModeratorReplied

    The older you get the more you have to pay attention to: mechanical systems (electrical, plumbing, HVAC); roof; foundation; windows; rot/insect/termite damage; insulation. Older houses that were originally expensive houses are a better bet than lower class/factory worker housing. One thing to remember is that cheap houses (in the US) were always cheap houses, no matter when they were built. That said, old lumber was usually old-growth and some of that lumber is virtually petrified so that nothing's going to eat it or rot it. 

    business profile image
    Skyline Properties
    0.0 star
    0 Reviews

    User Stats

    16
    Posts
    2
    Votes
    Kamil Pieniadz
    • Rental Property Investor
    • St. Louis, MO
    2
    Votes |
    16
    Posts
    Kamil Pieniadz
    • Rental Property Investor
    • St. Louis, MO
    Replied

    Thanks for the input everyone. I received similar information from my home inspector, who in my opinion, does great work. Just wanted multiple opinions on the topic.

    Account Closed
    • Contractor
    • Mickleton, NJ
    112
    Votes |
    114
    Posts
    Account Closed
    • Contractor
    • Mickleton, NJ
    Replied

    in the northeast we see some very old homes that are structurally fine and can last.  when i inspect these homes i look for structural issues.  foundations are a big deal, water flow anything that can contribute to sinking or a major issue down the road.