Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
St. Louis Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Ryan Calloway
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Exclusive Buyer's Agency Agreement required by state of MO?

Ryan Calloway
Posted

Hey y'all,

I'm a new investor and recent transplant to St Louis. Looking an agent and am in talks with one who wants me to sign an Exclusive Buyer's Agency Agreement. 

They said, "The state of MO requires this document be in place before (1) an agent has considerable info with regards to a Buyer's finances and personal information and (2) before a home is entered for a showing. The state also says that if this agreement is not in place, all agents are a sub-agent of the Seller and are obligated to represent her interests."

I've received conflicting information when I tried to verify this. Can anyone please clarify?

Thanks in advance!

Loading replies...