Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Minneapolis Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on .

User Stats

48
Posts
14
Votes
Cha Yang
  • Investor
  • St. Paul, MN
14
Votes |
48
Posts

"Subject to" insurance issue

Cha Yang
  • Investor
  • St. Paul, MN
Posted
Hi BP, Just wondering what your thoughts or what you have done about insuring properties taken "subject to" in the twincities? I have a property that I go via Sub To back in august. I had the sellers keep their original policy and add me as additional insured to avoid due on sale. Now the Insurance company want to cancel the policy because the sellers are no longer the owners of the property. Should I just get a new policy and add the sellers as additional insured or should I get a policy and not add the sellers? Trying to minimize the possibility of Due on Sale as much as possible.