Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Minneapolis Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago,

User Stats

48
Posts
14
Votes
Cha Yang
  • Investor
  • St. Paul, MN
14
Votes |
48
Posts

"Subject to" insurance issue

Cha Yang
  • Investor
  • St. Paul, MN
Posted
Hi BP, Just wondering what your thoughts or what you have done about insuring properties taken "subject to" in the twincities? I have a property that I go via Sub To back in august. I had the sellers keep their original policy and add me as additional insured to avoid due on sale. Now the Insurance company want to cancel the policy because the sellers are no longer the owners of the property. Should I just get a new policy and add the sellers as additional insured or should I get a policy and not add the sellers? Trying to minimize the possibility of Due on Sale as much as possible.