Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Minneapolis Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Jake Gratzer
Pro Member
  • Minneapolis, MN
0
Votes |
4
Posts

Fence Laws in MN

Jake Gratzer
Pro Member
  • Minneapolis, MN
Posted

Hi Everybody,

First time post here. I had a quick question I was hoping somebody could answer. I recently bought a SFH in South Minneapolis and there is an existing fence on the property. I believe that fencing laws in MN state that if one owner wants a fence both parties need to split the cost. Does anybody know what the rules are regarding putting up a new fence over an existing fence? If I decided to put up a new fence would the neighbors on both sides be responsible for splitting the cost or because there is an existing fence are they not responsible?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

jake

  • Jake Gratzer
  • Loading replies...