Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

31
Posts
5
Votes
Nikhil Nirmel
  • Investor
  • united states of america
5
Votes |
31
Posts

Thoughts on buying equity in high-equity tax delinquent homes?

Nikhil Nirmel
  • Investor
  • united states of america
Posted

Looking for an evaluation of my proposed strategy.

- Identify tax delinquent properties. Figure out which of them are owned free & clear or have low mortgage balances.

- Make an offer to their owners like this. e.g. Property worth $200k, they owe $15k. I say, I'll give you $50k today, you pay off your tax debt, and you give me 25% of what you eventually sell the property for plus $3000 or an additional 1.5% of the eventual sale price per year. Homeowner wins because their debt is paid, and they have the option of making no payments. The holder of the tax debt - whether the county or an investor - wins because they get paid. And I win because I get income and appreciation from a property I don't manage. 

Has this been tried? Where could I go wrong?

Thanks!

Loading replies...