Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

130
Posts
17
Votes
Patrick Sears
  • Midlothian, VA
17
Votes |
130
Posts

Selling RE with owner carry but retaining an equity position?

Patrick Sears
  • Midlothian, VA
Posted
Hello, Curious if anyone has sold a home with owner-financing and designed the deal to keep a portion of the ownership of the house along with the new home owners? I'm talking about staying on the title with them, and keeping a partial equity position in order to keep the home more affordable to them via a lower purchase price or smaller down payment. I can definetly see this being of value of high price areas like Seattle or SF. I guess this would be a "residential partnership" I'm talking about consumer end-users, not investors. Overtly high-priced RE isn't a problem where I am, but I thought this might be a good way to share in the appreciation of the house while still selling (vs. renting) as a business model. No landlord headaches (main argument against buy-and-hold) and no giving up of future appreciation potential and a portion of tax benefits (main argument against selling on terms). I vacillate back and forth between buy & hold rentals vs flipping w/owner-finance; why not just do both...? I also figure that if I am on the title with the buyers, I might have a stronger hand in court if they decide to quit paying. Maybe? Yes? No? Any Dodd-Frank or other nanny-state nonsense legal land-mines to look out for here? Thanks!

Loading replies...