Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago,

User Stats

309
Posts
100
Votes
Sandy Uhlmann
  • Investor
  • Jefferson City, MO
100
Votes |
309
Posts

NP second in Kansas: Cross Claim or answer out of time?

Sandy Uhlmann
  • Investor
  • Jefferson City, MO
Posted

I have a NP second in KS.  Currently there is equity in this home.  According to Netronline, the first has initiated FC (in April) but now, according to court info the case is "on hold for loss mitigation"  I contacted the attorney of the first lien holder and she was no longer with that firm.  When I contacted the firm that is handling the FC they said they were told to put the case on hold-they assumed that they were working things out with the borrower.  

I was advised to initiate FC from the second position just to get the process started in case the first drops their case thus I am the next in line (so to speak)

Just got off the phone to an attorney who suggested that instead, I file either an "answer out of time" or file a cross claim into the Sr. FC so I go on record as owner of the second.  I was under the assumption that as the owner of the second if the property went to sale and their was excess money It would automatically be paid to the second.  He said that this is not the case.  He spoke of buyouts and that can occur and that if there was any equity left that the borrowers can assert that equity as theirs even if they have a second that they have not been paying on.  

As it stands now, it appears that the borrowers are contesting a lot of the first's FC issue and that being said, I assume that the first has been racking up a lot of attorney fees that would add to the total bill    and eat into any equity that my second ever had in the property.  Additiionally,  I was quoted an attorney bill of $2700 plus $215/hour if my second gets contested.  I asked him if I could even just send out a demand letter ($100) but he said that this would do nothing.

I don't completely understand the "answer out of time" or the filing of the cross claim.  I have a general understanding of what they are but not really how it is going to help my case.  I don't know if I should spend money on this loan or not?  Great looking house in a nice area of Overland Park, KS.  

Does anyone have any advice on how to proceed?  I guess it is just not as simple as filing for a FC on the second in KS.

Loading replies...