Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$39.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

1,548
Posts
1,437
Votes
Denise Evans
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Tuscaloosa, AL
1,437
Votes |
1,548
Posts

Alabama Tax Sale Excess Funds Strategy is Back!!!

Denise Evans
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Tuscaloosa, AL
Posted

The Alabama Supreme Court ruled on June 24, 2022 that the retroactive portion of a tax sale statute was illegal. The statute stripped former owners (and the investors who partnered with them, by implication) of their rights to claim the excess funds in a tax sale. The scenario is an auction for unpaid taxes of $1,000 as an example. The bidding reaches $20,000. Who is entitled to the excess $19,000?  Earlier Supreme Court decisions said the owner could claim that money. Unhappy special interests got legislation passed that said "only if the owner redeems" and the law was specified as retroactive.

I am paraphrasing, but the recent decision said, "You cannot just pass a law and make it retroactive and deprive people of their property rights with a wave of your magic wand!"

So, for tax auctions before the 2014 amendment, excess funds strategies are back on again because the retroactive part of the statute has been struck down.

What about AFTER the statute was passed, so "retroactive" is not an issue?  Good question. It is exactly the same reasoning, you cannot just take people's property rights away.  If my house sold for $20,000 for unpaid taxes of $1,000, then my house had AT LEAST $19,000 worth of value that the counties want to keep unless I redeem. What if my house isn't worth redeeming? I'm entitled to at least my $19,000, right?

Another case is bubbling up in the appeals process that will probably say the same reasoning as in the June 24 case applies to tax auctions after 2014, too.

WHO exactly is the owner entitled to the money. Formerly it was thought "owner" meant the person who did not pay their taxes.  Another Supreme Court decision from several years ago said it is the owner at the time of the claim for the money. Which might be different from the owner at the time of the tax auction.

What does that mean to you? Start researching the excess funds treasure troves again in Alabama, update your joint venture agreements, and sign up CURRENT owners so you can claim that money and split it according to however you negotiate the split.  Happy days will soon be here again, and you should be ready.

Often, the current owner is the tax deed holder. Think about that, and what it means if you have tax deeds!  You can get some of your own money back.

Loading replies...