Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago,

User Stats

54
Posts
36
Votes
Gregory Stanley
  • Attorney
  • Alabama
36
Votes |
54
Posts

Alabama Appeals Court Ruled to uphold Code section on Redemptions

Gregory Stanley
  • Attorney
  • Alabama
Posted

Alabama redemptions allow for an investor to recover the value of the improvements they made while in possession of tax lien property.  Some Alabama Courts had been using cost, or other strict criteria to determine the amount, today the Alabama Appeals Court ruled that the Value of improvements, not cost, is to be paid to redeem.  The Court further held that the recent strict interpretation that "preservation improvements" only applied to work that prevented waste was incorrect.   Preservation improvements for tax sales is similar to foreclosure redemptions by code, and the Appeals Court directed the lower court to apply the historically used meaning and award the value of improvements made to the residential property within reason. 

Loading replies...