Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

98
Posts
18
Votes
Adam Demchik
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Oxford, MI
18
Votes |
98
Posts

House had mold..was cleaned with bleach and primed with Kilz...is this good enough?

Adam Demchik
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Oxford, MI
Posted

Looking to purchase a rehab and the seller has already remediated a mold issue by using bleach and painting everything with Kilz. I am pretty sure this is not the correct method. The house had mold in the attic and in the bedrooms. I have no issues hiring out the mold remediation process but can I do it correctly if it has been painted with Kilz? Is there an air test I can perform? Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

87
Posts
40
Votes
Travis West
  • The Woodlands, TX
40
Votes |
87
Posts
Travis West
  • The Woodlands, TX
Replied

Hi Adam.

There is virtually no difference between mold and mildew. They are both biological in nature, occur when water is present, and can cause health problems if/when susceptible people are exposed.

To answer you question, I would say the following:

If the treatment-cleaning with Clorox was done in a safe manner and the mold colonies were captured effectively, then perhaps it was done well. This also assumes that the mold growth was on the surface of the wall materials.

If however, the mold was caused by a severe water leak and the wallboard became saturated, then the mold's hyphal structure (microscopic branches) likely became embedded in the wallboard. In this instance, simply wiping with Clorox and water won't help much.

Treatment with Kilz or even an encapsulating paint (I.e. Fosters) will be sufficient in the first instance. This treatment would not be effective in the second example - involving the hyphal structures.

I agree with others that you should test the air for airborne mold. I would suggest however, that you only do that AFTER you are personally satisfied that the seller treated the mold as outlined in the first example. If however, the wallboard was wet from a water leak, and if the structural integrity of the wallboard was compromised, opt to replace it (or have the seller do so). In this case, air testing should only be considered after the work is safely completed.

When wallboard is affected by live liquid water and the structural integrity of the wallboard is compromised, cut it out. Make that problem really go away.

If the mold is because of condensation and was only present on the surface, a good wiping, treatment with paint (Kilz or Fosters) and a quick air sampling can easily resolve your concerns.

Either way, it offers you a good point of negotiation on reducing the offer price for a property.

Travis West
CIEC (Certified Indoor Environmental Consultant)
MAC0325 (Mold Assessment Consultant licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services)

Loading replies...