Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

72
Posts
19
Votes
Doron Rice
  • Closter, NJ
19
Votes |
72
Posts

How to structure a Flipping partnership with a passive investor

Doron Rice
  • Closter, NJ
Posted

Hi all,

A friend of mine, who is a successful business owner, wants to partner with me to flip houses. Since I have flipping experience and am very active in RE investing, he will be a passive investor. I am not sure how to structure this partnership and wanted to get your opinion. Should he bring all of the capital? should I have a skin in the game? what percentage of the proceeds should each of us receive etc...

Thanks!

Doron

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

132
Posts
70
Votes
Ken Jernigan
  • Wilmington, NC
70
Votes |
132
Posts
Ken Jernigan
  • Wilmington, NC
Replied

Traditional structure for larger deals like this is preferred return to investor, something in the 7-10% range and 70/30 investor/sponsor split on liquidation.

Loading replies...