Rehabbing & House Flipping
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
1031 Exchanges
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30d83/30d83e9bbea9dd5a18464c7450b8b15d7ec14e08" alt="Brian Gerace's profile image"
70% Rule in High Priced Areas(CA)
Does the 70% rule hold relatively true in higher priced areas such as CA. I am looking at a home listed at 1M needs about 100K rehab and has an ARV of 1.3M. Using the 70% rule, my max purchase price should be 810,000. Seems a little implausible to obtain for 190k under ask. It seems like as priced there is enough profit to make the deal go. I am sure I am missing something so any thoughts would be appreciated.