Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

125
Posts
7
Votes
Jeremy Lee
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
7
Votes |
125
Posts

CA: handymen vs contractors

Jeremy Lee
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
Posted

Hey all,

Just wanted to clarify but in California if I have repairs that cost over $500 including parts and labor, I need to hire a licensed contractor to do the work. If it's under $500 (including parts and labor) I can just hire a handyman for the work.

I have repair work that needs to be done post water damage remediation in my kitchen, bedroom and dining area. This includes drywall/texturing/paint, re-hanging cabinetry, installing baseboards, replacing carpet padding and tacking/stretching carpet back in place, replacing an ice maker box valve, as well as painting (though we may just do this ourselves). I had a couple handymen come out who I don't think are licensed through the state of California, and both quoted well over $500 for the work to be done. I wouldn't want to hire these guys, even if they're offering lower prices, at the risk of either of us getting in trouble.

Is it probably a best bet just to avoid/pass up on going with these guys in favor of using a licensed contractor? So far all the quotes I've received have been between $1200-$1900 for the scope of work so this definitely isn't a $500 job. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17
Posts
10
Votes
Brian Rhodes
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
10
Votes |
17
Posts
Brian Rhodes
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

Yeah, the state wants you to pull a permit for everything; replacing a toilet or painting a wall. The purpose of permits is to uphold safety and construction codes/standards. My opinion is that if you doing it right (to code) and not trying to cheat, you can use a handyman without permits. Sorry I missed the plumbing for the ice maker (still not a big deal for a good handyman, still no permit). Yelp reviews are actually one of the best ways to tell if someone is good or not (actual customer ratings and comments). I do agree with @Danery Amador in that you have to balance your construction experience (to supervise a handyman's work) and time available with the cost and convenience of a licensed contractor. In regard to the handyman being considered an employee, I doubt any handyman is clued in enough to sue for workers comp. The reality about the license and the permits is that if you don't have a construction dumpster in your front yard and a major rehab going on, you can fly under the radar with the city enforcement. Just make sure the work is done correctly and to code. Otherwise, bite the bullet and hire a contractor. There are just as many bad contractors as there are handymen, and yes, drug relapse does happen:)

Loading replies...