Rehabbing & House Flipping
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d933/5d9333c7e82d5f20f5e7fbc1b5737a64ccea47dd" alt="Danny Lambert's profile image"
How much I offer: does it really matter?
Hello BP Friends,
I’m a new investor in the market for a live-in flip. I am wondering if paying what would normally be considered “too much” really matters if I am just going to perform a cash-out refinance soon anyway. Please challenge my rationale in this example:
Let's say the seller wants $100,000 for their house, it is in an excellent location to rent rooms out, and it is getting little traction on the marketplace. I would have to spend $50,000 to achieve an ARV of $200,000. Because I will apply for a cash-out refinance of the property after the repairs are completed, I think I should just give the seller the price requested ($100,000) to ensure I grab the property instead taking the risk involved with offering less (let's say $90,000). My down payment will not be drastically different even if I put down 20% of the purchase price ($20,000 versus $18,000). My rationale is that difference ($2,000 in the example) does not matter much anyway because the bank will insist when I refinance that I keep 20% equity in the house ($40,000 assuming my ARV estimate is accurate). I grant the time-value-of-money principle says I could have reinvested that $2,000 difference, but that matters little to me given that I spent $70,000 (50K in rehab costs plus 20K down) to make $50,000, a 28% ROI. The house is now worth $200,000 and that $2,000 is "stuck" in the house as equity either way. I also grant the risk of my offer strategy goes up as I replace fictional numbers with real ones, but wouldn't same rationale still apply?
Regards,
Danny
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5f3a/b5f3add4fca5d971460eadce7f81a88378eb5417" alt="J Scott's profile image"
You should always know the maximum you *can* pay, and then decide from there the tradeoff of trying to get the property for less.
If you think there is great risk offering less than $100K and $100K is a number that makes it a worthwhile deal for you, then offer $100K...