Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

65
Posts
31
Votes
Danny Lambert
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Washington, D.C.
31
Votes |
65
Posts

How much I offer: does it really matter?

Danny Lambert
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Washington, D.C.
Posted

Hello BP Friends,

I’m a new investor in the market for a live-in flip. I am wondering if paying what would normally be considered “too much” really matters if I am just going to perform a cash-out refinance soon anyway. Please challenge my rationale in this example:

Let's say the seller wants $100,000 for their house, it is in an excellent location to rent rooms out, and it is getting little traction on the marketplace. I would have to spend $50,000 to achieve an ARV of $200,000. Because I will apply for a cash-out refinance of the property after the repairs are completed, I think I should just give the seller the price requested ($100,000) to ensure I grab the property instead taking the risk involved with offering less (let's say $90,000). My down payment will not be drastically different even if I put down 20% of the purchase price ($20,000 versus $18,000). My rationale is that difference ($2,000 in the example) does not matter much anyway because the bank will insist when I refinance that I keep 20% equity in the house ($40,000 assuming my ARV estimate is accurate). I grant the time-value-of-money principle says I could have reinvested that $2,000 difference, but that matters little to me given that I spent $70,000 (50K in rehab costs plus 20K down) to make $50,000, a 28% ROI. The house is now worth $200,000 and that $2,000 is "stuck" in the house as equity either way. I also grant the risk of my offer strategy goes up as I replace fictional numbers with real ones, but wouldn't same rationale still apply?

Regards,

Danny

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,199
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,199
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

You should always know the maximum you *can* pay, and then decide from there the tradeoff of trying to get the property for less.

If you think there is great risk offering less than $100K and $100K is a number that makes it a worthwhile deal for you, then offer $100K...

Loading replies...