Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

65
Posts
31
Votes
Danny Lambert
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Washington, D.C.
31
Votes |
65
Posts

How much I offer: does it really matter?

Danny Lambert
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Washington, D.C.
Posted

Hello BP Friends,

I’m a new investor in the market for a live-in flip. I am wondering if paying what would normally be considered “too much” really matters if I am just going to perform a cash-out refinance soon anyway. Please challenge my rationale in this example:

Let's say the seller wants $100,000 for their house, it is in an excellent location to rent rooms out, and it is getting little traction on the marketplace. I would have to spend $50,000 to achieve an ARV of $200,000. Because I will apply for a cash-out refinance of the property after the repairs are completed, I think I should just give the seller the price requested ($100,000) to ensure I grab the property instead taking the risk involved with offering less (let's say $90,000). My down payment will not be drastically different even if I put down 20% of the purchase price ($20,000 versus $18,000). My rationale is that difference ($2,000 in the example) does not matter much anyway because the bank will insist when I refinance that I keep 20% equity in the house ($40,000 assuming my ARV estimate is accurate). I grant the time-value-of-money principle says I could have reinvested that $2,000 difference, but that matters little to me given that I spent $70,000 (50K in rehab costs plus 20K down) to make $50,000, a 28% ROI. The house is now worth $200,000 and that $2,000 is "stuck" in the house as equity either way. I also grant the risk of my offer strategy goes up as I replace fictional numbers with real ones, but wouldn't same rationale still apply?

Regards,

Danny

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,195
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,195
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

You should always know the maximum you *can* pay, and then decide from there the tradeoff of trying to get the property for less.

If you think there is great risk offering less than $100K and $100K is a number that makes it a worthwhile deal for you, then offer $100K...

Loading replies...