Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

67
Posts
28
Votes
Corbett Brasington
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
28
Votes |
67
Posts

Phase timelines...when you are wrong...how wrong are you....

Corbett Brasington
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
Posted

TLDR: When you are wrong on estimating TIME in a phase of a construction project....how off are you?   x1.5?  x3?  x6? x 10?  And yes I know the technical answer is "IT DEPENDS" so I will ask that we skip the micro as this is a question about MACRO for the purpose of understanding risk.

Detailed:

So I am a big fan of PERT method for estimating time of work.  PERT works with an optimistic number, expected, and pessimistic number gives you a planned amount based on a bell curve (which you can skew if you choose).   I come from the software world and when you have a feature you have to estimate a distribution that has worked well for me is this.

Expected Time of feature is 1 week.

  • Values a function of typical load.
  • Optimistic value: .8 of expected (When its better than expected its really only 20% better)
  • Expected value: 1 of expected time
  • Pessimistic value: x 6 of expected time.  (When we are wrong...its not a little wrong its usually off by a lot from things we cannot predict.)

Using the Normal Distribution (Normal Bell Curve)

Normal PERT

  • = (Optimistic Value + Expected Value*4 + Pessimist Value) / 6 
  • = (.8 + 1*4 + 6)/6 = 10.8/6 
  • = Planned Value of 1.8 Weeks
  • *I use this if residual risk is low

Negatively Skewed PERT  

  • = (Optimistic Value + Expected Value*3 + Pessimist Value*2) / 6
  • = (.8 + 1*3 + 6*2)/6 = 15.8/6
  • = Planned Value of 2.63
  • *I use this if if the residual risk is medium

Very Negatively Skewed PERT

  • = (Optimistic Value + Expected Value*2 + Pessimist Value*3) / 6
  • = (.8 + 1*2 + 6*3)/6 = 20.8/6
  • = Planned Value of 3.46
  • *I use this if if the residual risk is medium

In my professional life this approach has served me very well.  So when you are wrong on estimating TIME in a phase of a construction project, in general....how off are you? x1.5? x3? x6? x 10?  And yes I know the technical answer is "IT DEPENDS" so I will ask that we skip the micro as this is a question about MACRO for the purpose of understanding risk.

Thanks I appreciate your help!

    Loading replies...