Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago,

User Stats

67
Posts
28
Votes
Corbett Brasington
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
28
Votes |
67
Posts

Phase timelines...when you are wrong...how wrong are you....

Corbett Brasington
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Antonio, TX
Posted

TLDR: When you are wrong on estimating TIME in a phase of a construction project....how off are you?   x1.5?  x3?  x6? x 10?  And yes I know the technical answer is "IT DEPENDS" so I will ask that we skip the micro as this is a question about MACRO for the purpose of understanding risk.

Detailed:

So I am a big fan of PERT method for estimating time of work.  PERT works with an optimistic number, expected, and pessimistic number gives you a planned amount based on a bell curve (which you can skew if you choose).   I come from the software world and when you have a feature you have to estimate a distribution that has worked well for me is this.

Expected Time of feature is 1 week.

  • Values a function of typical load.
  • Optimistic value: .8 of expected (When its better than expected its really only 20% better)
  • Expected value: 1 of expected time
  • Pessimistic value: x 6 of expected time.  (When we are wrong...its not a little wrong its usually off by a lot from things we cannot predict.)

Using the Normal Distribution (Normal Bell Curve)

Normal PERT

  • = (Optimistic Value + Expected Value*4 + Pessimist Value) / 6 
  • = (.8 + 1*4 + 6)/6 = 10.8/6 
  • = Planned Value of 1.8 Weeks
  • *I use this if residual risk is low

Negatively Skewed PERT  

  • = (Optimistic Value + Expected Value*3 + Pessimist Value*2) / 6
  • = (.8 + 1*3 + 6*2)/6 = 15.8/6
  • = Planned Value of 2.63
  • *I use this if if the residual risk is medium

Very Negatively Skewed PERT

  • = (Optimistic Value + Expected Value*2 + Pessimist Value*3) / 6
  • = (.8 + 1*2 + 6*3)/6 = 20.8/6
  • = Planned Value of 3.46
  • *I use this if if the residual risk is medium

In my professional life this approach has served me very well.  So when you are wrong on estimating TIME in a phase of a construction project, in general....how off are you? x1.5? x3? x6? x 10?  And yes I know the technical answer is "IT DEPENDS" so I will ask that we skip the micro as this is a question about MACRO for the purpose of understanding risk.

Thanks I appreciate your help!

    Loading replies...