Chicago Real Estate Forum
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply
Question on Seller's Disclosure regarding Material Defects
Have a question on something mentioned in sellers disclosure on the contract. In the disclosure section, sellers mentioned that “they are aware of leaks or material defects in the roofs, ceilings or chimney”. In the additional comments section, they mentioned “there was a some leaks which was fixed two years back and there were no issues since then.”
I did the inspection and they didn’t find any issues on the report either since the roofs were dry during inspection. My question is - material defect definition in the contract (provided below for reference) specifies sellers to call out any conditions “unless seller believes that condition is corrected”. If they think it’s fixed why are they disclosing it as a material defect? Is it because they think there are no issues but not sure if it’s fully corrected? Or is it standard to call them out as material defects even if we fixed it in the past. Should I ask our attorney to ask anything to clarify this since it's fine during visual inspection? What would be the best practise in such a scenario to make sure this won't be an issue once we move in.
Definition from contract - “material defect means a condition that would have a substantial adverse effect on the value of the residential real property or that would significantly impair the health or safety of future occupants of the residential real property unless the seller reasonably believes that the condition has been corrected.”
Most Popular Reply
![Matthew Olszak's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/338350/1683658737-avatar-kazslo.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=4016x4016@209x0/cover=128x128&v=2)
The reality is that almost nobody involved (buyers/sellers/agents) actually reads and understands the whole "material defect" thing. So they likely disclosed the previous issue to cover themselves in case you rip back the roofing some day and find damaged decking or something of the sort and then want to (unsuccessful) try to sue them. Its a good sign of an honest seller.
Don't place any value on disclosures, perform your own due diligence like inspections. Unless the seller was blatantly covering up a HUGE issue (like recently constructing a wall in front of a collapsing/leaking foundation), your chances of successfully wining a lawsuit are very low, and your chances of actual recovery even less.
So what do you do? You employ professionals to assess the condition of the property. If you're concerned about the roof, hire a licensed roofer (and preferably someone HAAG certified for residential roofing) to perform an inspection and have them review the repair records as well. Your home inspector is limited in knowledge as to specific trades and normally will only be able to spot certain red-flags which will cause them to then refer you to a licensed tradesman for further evaluation.