Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Chicago Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

27
Posts
13
Votes
Gillian C.
  • Chicago
13
Votes |
27
Posts

Chicago question on moving to individually metered water

Gillian C.
  • Chicago
Posted

Hi Chicago folks. we have a 3-flat and we are looking at gutting the building to make the apartments individually metered for water and gas. Because our water bill is water, sewer, and trash, I'm wondering how this bill will split if we meter the water separately. Will Chicago now send us a bill for sewer and trash, or will they prorate trash to the tenants as well? Sewer is charged at 100% of water so I'm guessing/hoping that at least sewer will be pushed to individual units as well per their water usage, but wanted to confirm. Trying to figure out the total savings as we evaluate the ROI of this project. All thoughts welcome.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

118
Posts
66
Votes
Jason Albasha
  • Lender
  • Chicago
66
Votes |
118
Posts
Jason Albasha
  • Lender
  • Chicago
Replied

Take a look at other rentals. I have yet to see a rental in Chicago which has tenants paying water. This will be a huge turn off for tenants and I’d think twice about doing this. 

I understand the thought behind it, make tenants responsible for the bill, cut down operating costs, tenants will be more accountable if they’re paying, etc. yet all that only matters if you actually have a tenant. Any money saved would probably be offset by the possibility of having 1 month extra of vacancy. 

Everything can be factored into the rent. Landlord pays water? Rent is $1600. Tenant pays water? Rent is $1500. Catch my drift? The same stability you’re looking by putting the water bill on the tenant is the same stability tenants are looking for by having you pay the water. 

I can’t answer your question directly yet my advice is not to split it because 99% of Chicago landlords pay water and it would be harder to rent your place. Just factor it into the rent as stated above. 

Loading replies...