Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Chicago Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

316
Posts
130
Votes
Calvin Lipscomb
  • Brooklyn, NY
130
Votes |
316
Posts

6 Family Unit Inspection Repeating The Same Problem

Calvin Lipscomb
  • Brooklyn, NY
Posted

Having the same problem again.  6 Family unit property, all cash deal, and the seller's agent is saying that 6-8 hours is too long and has a person that can do it in 3 hours.  We having concerns all around about the standard protocol for an inspection. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

39
Posts
13
Votes
Marco Morales
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
13
Votes |
39
Posts
Marco Morales
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
Replied

If they won’t allow the appropriate amount of time for an inspection then tell the listing agent you and your team will walk away. Only allowing 3 hours for a 6-unit inspection sounds like a major red flag. 

Loading replies...