Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Chicago Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

12
Posts
1
Votes
Steve Rogers
  • Glendale Heights, IL
1
Votes |
12
Posts

Question about a quit claim in Chicago property taxes and fines

Steve Rogers
  • Glendale Heights, IL
Posted

My brother had put a lot in my name without my consent via quit claim deed. It's a small lot about 3000 square feet in Hyde Park in south Chicago. I had contacted an attorney because I had wanted to get the deed nullified but the attorney had pushed me to sell the property instead, and the real estate agent we worked with waaaay overevaluated the property. He listed the property and now we've dropped the price 2 times already and it's currently sitting at 1/4 what the original evaluation was. Basically a combination of bad advice from this lawyer and the real estate agent over evaluating the hell out of the property has really put me in a bad spot.

The biggest issue is that the property has 4500 in back taxes and 2300 in city fines. Now the City of Chicago has retained a law firm to collect this 2300 debt from me. It was 1800 but now interest is accruing in it monthly. I need to do something about it ASAP

I don't want any money but I just want to get rid of this property and I'm in dire straits to do so. My brother has agreed to take it back via quit claim deed. I know that the property taxes are against the property itself so I know those go with the property.

But with the city fines now with a law firm trying to collect a debt from me. What happens if the property goes to my brother via quit claim deed? Am I still liable for the city fines? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

89
Posts
66
Votes
Chris Titcomb
  • Real Estate Attorney
  • Chicago, IL
66
Votes |
89
Posts
Chris Titcomb
  • Real Estate Attorney
  • Chicago, IL
Replied

@Brie Schmidt

@Steve Rogers there are some issues here that require more details.

However, the advice regarding “acceptance” is correct. If you’d like to PM me the address, I can look up the Quit Claim Deed (QCD) on the Recorder’s site and see if a “Statement by Grantor and Grantee” page was executed. This page verifies that the name of the Grantee on the QCD is legal person/valid Illinois entity. If you signed that, you essentially accepted the conveyance.

Regarding property taxes, they run with the land and are a perpetual lien on title. So if your name is on title, you have an obligation to pay the taxes. However, if you take your name off title, via another QCD, your obligation to pay the back taxes end.

And along those lines, you don’t need to have taxes paid in full to record a QCD; you just need to pay the outstanding water bill in Chicago. That’s one of the risks when taking title via QCD, the Grantor is not warranting anything, like unpaid property taxes for example. Quit claim deeds operate, in effect, as a release of whatever interest the grantor has or may have in the property.

Regarding city fines, I used to work for the City in the Department of Administrative Hearings, and, typically, if you no longer own the property, the City can’t collect against you.

Loading replies...