Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Oakland Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago,

User Stats

19
Posts
18
Votes
Jason Porto
Pro Member
  • New to Real Estate
  • Oakland, CA
18
Votes |
19
Posts

Nonconforming basement units

Jason Porto
Pro Member
  • New to Real Estate
  • Oakland, CA
Posted

Hi all. I'm looking at a duplex in Oakland with 2 legit units plus one nonconforming (low ceiling, lack of egress is some rooms) basement unit that is vacant but has been rented in the past. Without rent from the basement unit the numbers don't work for me so I'm trying to understand the ramifications of having a unit like that. What might the be consequences if the city decides to say something about it? It sounds like many people seek these things out, but everybody's risk tolerance is different. What would you do? Go for it or pass? Any thoughts are welcome. Thank you.

  • Jason Porto
  • Loading replies...