Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Oakland Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

53
Posts
9
Votes
Anthony Barbato
  • Developer
  • San Francisco
9
Votes |
53
Posts

Do you have to pull permits on an illegal addition in Oakland?

Anthony Barbato
  • Developer
  • San Francisco
Posted

I have come across an off market property that has a finished top level, and the bottom level is a converted finished living space without pulling permits. It used to be a bare concrete garage. Can it be grandfathered in? It was built in 2007. For the new buyer that is flipping this property, should they get permits and have it looked at by the tax assessor so that they confirm the additional square footage? The investors I've talked to want to rehab and flip the property without going through the bureaucracy. What are your thoughts?

Loading replies...