Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Oakland Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

53
Posts
9
Votes
Anthony Barbato
  • Developer
  • San Francisco
9
Votes |
53
Posts

Do you have to pull permits on an illegal addition in Oakland?

Anthony Barbato
  • Developer
  • San Francisco
Posted

I have come across an off market property that has a finished top level, and the bottom level is a converted finished living space without pulling permits. It used to be a bare concrete garage. Can it be grandfathered in? It was built in 2007. For the new buyer that is flipping this property, should they get permits and have it looked at by the tax assessor so that they confirm the additional square footage? The investors I've talked to want to rehab and flip the property without going through the bureaucracy. What are your thoughts?

Loading replies...