Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Investor Mindset
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 12 years ago,

User Stats

218
Posts
48
Votes
Grant P.
  • Denver, CO
48
Votes |
218
Posts

Is the 2% rule possible with houses I actually want to own in my market

Grant P.
  • Denver, CO
Posted

My big dilemma is the 2% rule. I see and hear everyone talking about it, and I am jealous of the ROI they are getting, but I have a few issues with it.

1. I really don't see this being possible in my market, not without dealing with a bad neighborhood/issues that come along with that.

2. I am happy with 1% because I still cash-flow plenty and I'm holding in hot areas that are appreciating quickly, and I typically rehab them to create equity in these places.

I know you can't have everything, and my strategy is different than those that just seek the 2%, but why am I stuck with 1% in a hot market with high rents?

Loading replies...