Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Investor Mindset
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,254
Posts
425
Votes
Steven J.
  • Urbana, IL
425
Votes |
1,254
Posts

Running Numbers: how do you take out your vacancy?

Steven J.
  • Urbana, IL
Posted

I'm curious as to some small details in running numbers some of you do.

I've been running numbers in the BP buy and hold calculator versus another speadsheet an investor gave me. They both are very helpful and give out almost the same information. One thing I do notice is where/when the vacancy is taken out.

Is it more wise to take a 10% vacancy off of total income (units + laundry + misc) or do you take 10% off of just the units? And is it preferred to not include vacancy in expenses but instead as part of your total income, or does it not matter? Is that just an aesthetic decision in your speadsheet as you're running numbers?

Reason I ask is its sending me slightly conflicting results. Its not a huge difference in smaller units with low turn over but as vacancy rate increases I think it really adds up.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,198
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,198
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

If reduced vacancy will impact gross income on non-rent items (like laundry), then I imagine you'd want to include the 10% loss across all income. On the other hand, if reduced vacancy won't impact income from those other sources (for example, storage that's only used by 5% of the tenants), you should probably not reduce income across the board.

Does that make sense?

Loading replies...