Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Investor Mindset
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Taylor Cole
  • Investor
  • Glendale, CA
1
Votes |
3
Posts

Putting More Equity Into A Single Property vs Diversifying

Taylor Cole
  • Investor
  • Glendale, CA
Posted

Hello, All! This is my first time posting on BP, and I am a very new investor. 

For the sake of this question, let's use a $200,000 home(s) for my below example:

If all other factors are neutral, say one had $120,000 worth of equity to put down for a leveraged investment, would one traditionally benefit more from putting all of that equity into a single property (more equity, lower interest rates, no PMI, lower monthly payment etc) OR would one typically benefit more by investing at or below the traditional 20% down and purchasing 3 properties with $40,000 down for each (more portfolio diversity, risk mitigation, potentially more cashflow etc)?

Does my above question have a case-by-case answer (e.g. do the math and see which specific investment(s) has more potential for a higher return and higher cashflow) OR is there an industry-standard cookie-cutter answer (e.g. NEVER do this or ALWAYS do that, when presented the opportunity)?                       
Thank you all so much, in advance. 

Loading replies...