Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 5 years ago on .

User Stats

506
Posts
224
Votes
Bernadeau C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Orlando, FL
224
Votes |
506
Posts

Subject-to Exit strategy for long term cash flow

Bernadeau C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Orlando, FL
Posted

All,

I am exploring the strategy of Subject-to so I can add it to my toolbelt. I invest mostly for cash flow long term I was wondering how would that look in a subject-to deal? I know of the typical exits such as lease option, lease for purchase but I am looking to see if there some others that would allow me to keep the long term cash flow. 

Could I simply hold the subject-to loan, until the loan is paid off. I read somewhere that it is not ethical to do so, as it will tie up the sellers credit in the event they want to buy another property in the future. has anyone done this before? is there an issue with it?

Should I refinance it, to free the sellers credit and just keep for Cashflow? does this make sense? 

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciate it.

  • Bernadeau C.